Preliminary Results - Revision history

WikiSysop at 19:33, 24 November 2021

2021-11-24T19:33:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 24 November 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	These are preliminary results based on an initial analysis of the Y-DNA values returned within the study. More in-depth analysis, reports, pedigrees, and other details will be made available for each group listed below.		These are preliminary results based on an initial analysis of the Y-DNA values returned within the study. More in-depth analysis, reports, pedigrees, and other details will be made available for each group listed below.

			Unless otherwise stated, all comparisons in this analysis is done at the 37 marker level.

	Within the Claiborne/Clyborn families there are two predominant Haplogroups - I-M170 & R-M269. These two groups alone account for 45 of the 57 Y-DNA results present.<br>		Within the Claiborne/Clyborn families there are two predominant Haplogroups - I-M170 & R-M269. These two groups alone account for 45 of the 57 Y-DNA results present.<br>

WikiSysop: /* Archetypal Pattern */

2021-11-24T19:32:51Z

Archetypal Pattern

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 24 November 2021
Line 91:		Line 91:

	===Archetypal Pattern===		===Archetypal Pattern===
	In what I am considering the base for this family group, due to the largest number of direct matches, the distinguishing feature is a value of 15-16-17-18 at allele DYS-464, which is known to be a fast-mutating gene. They also have values of 34-38 on allele CDY. The kits on the table below are based on a comparison of 30 markers of the archetype pattern. The table on the right shows the kits that belong to this pattern group, including two kits that should be considered too distant to be a match. I also included two kits (1581 & 5472) in this group that do not share the rest of the group’s DYS-464 pattern, but are otherwise closely related.		In what I am considering the base for this family group, due to the largest number of direct matches, the distinguishing feature is a value of 15-16-17-18 at allele DYS-464, which is known to be a fast-mutating gene. They also have values of 34-38 on allele CDY. The kits on the table below are based on a comparison of 37 markers of the archetype pattern. The table on the right shows the kits that belong to this pattern group, including two kits that should be considered too distant to be a match. I also included two kits (1581 & 5472) in this group that do not share the rest of the group’s DYS-464 pattern, but are otherwise closely related.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop: /* Archetypal Pattern */

2021-11-24T19:32:29Z

Archetypal Pattern

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 24 November 2021
Line 91:		Line 91:

	===Archetypal Pattern===		===Archetypal Pattern===
	In what I am considering the base for this family group, due to the largest number of direct matches, the distinguishing feature is a value of 15-16-17-18 at allele ~~DSY~~-464, which is known to be a fast-mutating gene. They also have values of 34-38 on allele CDY. The kits on the table below are based on a comparison of 30 markers of the archetype pattern. The table on the right shows the kits that belong to this pattern group, including two kits that should be considered too distant to be a match. I also included two kits (1581 & 5472) in this group that do not share the rest of the group’s DYS-464 pattern, but are otherwise closely related.		In what I am considering the base for this family group, due to the largest number of direct matches, the distinguishing feature is a value of 15-16-17-18 at allele DYS-464, which is known to be a fast-mutating gene. They also have values of 34-38 on allele CDY. The kits on the table below are based on a comparison of 30 markers of the archetype pattern. The table on the right shows the kits that belong to this pattern group, including two kits that should be considered too distant to be a match. I also included two kits (1581 & 5472) in this group that do not share the rest of the group’s DYS-464 pattern, but are otherwise closely related.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop: /* Pattern 2 */

2021-11-24T19:32:16Z

Pattern 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 24 November 2021
Line 156:		Line 156:

	===Pattern 2===		===Pattern 2===
	Pattern 2 is interesting in that the ~~DSY~~-464 allele values have mutated to be values of 15-16-17-17. The information on their table shows the values both in comparison to the Archetypal group and to each other. It is possible that these mutations occurred separately in two different branches in the family line independently, or that they are descended from each other. The number of generations shown here do roughly compute out to a Most Recent Common Ancestor approximately 400 years ago (give or take), which would put that ancestor squarely in the 1600’s.		Pattern 2 is interesting in that the DYS-464 allele values have mutated to be values of 15-16-17-17. The information on their table shows the values both in comparison to the Archetypal group and to each other. It is possible that these mutations occurred separately in two different branches in the family line independently, or that they are descended from each other. The number of generations shown here do roughly compute out to a Most Recent Common Ancestor approximately 400 years ago (give or take), which would put that ancestor squarely in the 1600’s.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop: /* Pattern 3 */

2021-11-24T19:32:04Z

Pattern 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 24 November 2021
Line 182:		Line 182:

	===Pattern 3===		===Pattern 3===
	Pattern 3 demonstrates a mutation of the ~~DSY~~-464 allele to values 15-15-17-17. Kits 1584 and 1585 are very closely related to each other, perhaps father and son. Three of these kits are reported to be from Ireland. It is known that some members of the Westmoreland Family left Cliburn Hall and moved to Ireland. Without examining the genealogical trees that accompany this data I cannot ascertain whether any of these kits are representative of that ancestor. However, based on the distance to the MRCA for the Westmoreland group, this ancestor would have been 1,400 years ago and would have come to Ireland during the 7th Century. Based on those calculations. Given that, I don’t think these kits represent the 17th Century Westmoreland Emigrant to Ireland. The Irish kits in Pattern 3 share a MRCA who lived circa 1,400.		Pattern 3 demonstrates a mutation of the DYS-464 allele to values 15-15-17-17. Kits 1584 and 1585 are very closely related to each other, perhaps father and son. Three of these kits are reported to be from Ireland. It is known that some members of the Westmoreland Family left Cliburn Hall and moved to Ireland. Without examining the genealogical trees that accompany this data I cannot ascertain whether any of these kits are representative of that ancestor. However, based on the distance to the MRCA for the Westmoreland group, this ancestor would have been 1,400 years ago and would have come to Ireland during the 7th Century. Based on those calculations. Given that, I don’t think these kits represent the 17th Century Westmoreland Emigrant to Ireland. The Irish kits in Pattern 3 share a MRCA who lived circa 1,400.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop: /* Pattern 5 */

2021-11-24T19:31:41Z

Pattern 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 24 November 2021
Line 252:		Line 252:

	===Pattern 5===		===Pattern 5===
	Pattern 5 is a pattern that returns values of 15-16-17-20 at allele ~~DSY~~-464. The first two kits on the table match 100% at 37 of 37 markers. The third kit is temporarily assigned to this group and matches at 9 of 12 markers, but a more comprehensive test should be taken to confirm this result. It is not possible to accurately compute the MRCA distances for this last kit. Based on the distances for the MRCA in this pattern of the other kits, they do not appear to be closely related to the main Westmoreland Group, but they do appear to be closely related to each other, perhaps immediate family or first cousins.		Pattern 5 is a pattern that returns values of 15-16-17-20 at allele DYS-464. The first two kits on the table match 100% at 37 of 37 markers. The third kit is temporarily assigned to this group and matches at 9 of 12 markers, but a more comprehensive test should be taken to confirm this result. It is not possible to accurately compute the MRCA distances for this last kit. Based on the distances for the MRCA in this pattern of the other kits, they do not appear to be closely related to the main Westmoreland Group, but they do appear to be closely related to each other, perhaps immediate family or first cousins.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop: /* Pattern 4 */

2021-11-24T19:31:29Z

Pattern 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 24 November 2021
Line 220:		Line 220:

	===Pattern 4===		===Pattern 4===
	Pattern 4 is a pattern that returns values of 15-16-16-17 at allele ~~DSY~~-464. The first two kits on the table match 100% at 37 of 37 markers. The third kit is temporarily assigned to this group and matches at 10 of 12 markers, but a more comprehensive test should be taken to confirm this result. It is not possible to accurately compute the MRCA distances for this third kit. Based on the distances for the MRCA in this pattern of the other kits, they do not appear to be closely related to the main Westmoreland Group, but they do appear to be closely related to each other.		Pattern 4 is a pattern that returns values of 15-16-16-17 at allele DYS-464. The first two kits on the table match 100% at 37 of 37 markers. The third kit is temporarily assigned to this group and matches at 10 of 12 markers, but a more comprehensive test should be taken to confirm this result. It is not possible to accurately compute the MRCA distances for this third kit. Based on the distances for the MRCA in this pattern of the other kits, they do not appear to be closely related to the main Westmoreland Group, but they do appear to be closely related to each other.

	{\|class="wikitable sortable"		{\|class="wikitable sortable"

WikiSysop at 19:16, 24 November 2021

2021-11-24T19:16:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 24 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have reworked and reorganized all of the DNA Results and sorted everyone by Haplogroup rather than location. I did this because 1st: People within the Westmoreland Family are known to have emigrated to both Ireland and the US, so this one genetic family is spread out over at least three different countries, and 2nd: Within the same country there are members of two different families living in close proximity (for example, within the state of Virginia during the 1600s). By staying focused on the genetics of the surnames rather than the specific locations as the primary factor and treating location as secondary, it should be less confusing which people are related to whom.		I have reworked and reorganized all of the DNA Results and sorted everyone by Haplogroup rather than location. I did this because 1st: People within the Westmoreland Family are known to have emigrated to both Ireland and the US, so this one genetic family is spread out over at least three different countries, and 2nd: Within the same country there are members of two different families living in close proximity (for example, within the state of Virginia during the 1600s). By staying focused on the genetics of the surnames rather than the specific locations as the primary factor and treating location as secondary, it should be less confusing which people are related to whom.

			These are preliminary results based on an initial analysis of the Y-DNA values returned within the study. More in-depth analysis, reports, pedigrees, and other details will be made available for each group listed below.

	Within the Claiborne/Clyborn families there are two predominant Haplogroups - I-M170 & R-M269. These two groups alone account for 45 of the 57 Y-DNA results present.<br>		Within the Claiborne/Clyborn families there are two predominant Haplogroups - I-M170 & R-M269. These two groups alone account for 45 of the 57 Y-DNA results present.<br>

WikiSysop: /* Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909) */

2021-11-24T19:14:24Z

Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 24 November 2021
Line 330:		Line 330:

	====Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)====		====Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)====
	The other kit, 48697, is also an outlier. It has a DYS-464 value of 15-15-15-15, but it is not related to the previous outlier. It has 13 deviations out of 37 markers and has a MRCA between 50-52 generations ago. Unlike some of the other examples, there are some specific details that are know about this kit. The kit belongs to a descendant of Elemuel B. Clyborn of Giles Co, VA (1834-1909). On Paper, the father is William Clyborn and the mother is Christina Croy. While we do know the mother to be correct, we have learned that William Clyborn is not the father of Lemuel. We have also learned that this DNA pattern does not match Croy either. The origin of this DNA pattern seems to be from a Non-Paternity Event or a name ~~Switch~~ of unknown origin.		The other kit, 48697, is also an outlier. It has a DYS-464 value of 15-15-15-15, but it is not related to the previous outlier. It has 13 deviations out of 37 markers and has a MRCA between 50-52 generations ago. Unlike some of the other examples, there are some specific details that are know about this kit. The kit belongs to a descendant of Elemuel B. Clyborn of Giles Co, VA (1834-1909). On Paper, the father is William Clyborn and the mother is Christina Croy. While we do know the mother to be correct, we have learned that William Clyborn is not the father of Lemuel. We have also learned that this DNA pattern does not match Croy either. The origin of this DNA pattern seems to be from a Non-Paternity Event or a name switch of unknown origin.

WikiSysop: /* Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909) */

2021-11-24T19:13:56Z

Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 24 November 2021
Line 330:		Line 330:

	====Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)====		====Elemuel B. Clyburn (1834-1909)====
	The other kit, 48697, is also an outlier. It has a DYS-464 value of 15-15-15-15, but it is not related to the previous outlier. It has 13 deviations out of 37 markers and has a MRCA between 50-52 generations ago. Unlike some of the other examples, there are some specific details that are know about this kit. The kit belongs to a descendant of ~~Lemuel(~~Elemuel) B. Clyborn of Giles Co, VA (1834-1909). On Paper, the father is William Clyborn and the mother is Christina Croy. While we do know the mother to be correct, we have learned that William Clyborn is not the father of Lemuel. We have also learned that this DNA pattern does not match Croy either. The origin of this DNA pattern seems to be from a Non-Paternity Event or a name Switch of unknown origin.		The other kit, 48697, is also an outlier. It has a DYS-464 value of 15-15-15-15, but it is not related to the previous outlier. It has 13 deviations out of 37 markers and has a MRCA between 50-52 generations ago. Unlike some of the other examples, there are some specific details that are know about this kit. The kit belongs to a descendant of Elemuel B. Clyborn of Giles Co, VA (1834-1909). On Paper, the father is William Clyborn and the mother is Christina Croy. While we do know the mother to be correct, we have learned that William Clyborn is not the father of Lemuel. We have also learned that this DNA pattern does not match Croy either. The origin of this DNA pattern seems to be from a Non-Paternity Event or a name Switch of unknown origin.